By Thomas Caldwell
I first saw Dogs in Space (written and directed by Richard Lowenstein) when I was in my twenties, some time in the late 1990s, about a decade after the film was released in 1986. It was a revelation. I’d never seen a film that felt so distinctively Melbourne in a way that I could recognise. Also, up until that point, I’d never seen an Australian film that felt so influenced by New Wave European cinema in its almost anarchic abandonment of traditional narrative structure. I had seen plenty of ‘worthy’ Australian art-house films (which I also love and cherish) but not something this playful and rebellious. It was instant love. I remember on at least two occasions introducing friends to Dogs in Space, and their response was always one of anger: ‘Why the hell haven’t you shown this to me before?’ they demanded.
And yet, Dogs in Space is about Melbourne in 1979, when I’d only been alive for a few years. I’m not at all qualified to comment on the authenticity of what takes place in the film. It feels slightly exaggerated, but the testimonies in the 2009 documentary We’re Livin’ on Dog Foodsuggest that it’s not.
What I did identify with was a spirit; the legacy of which I was experiencing at the time, living in share houses in Melbourne’s inner suburbs. Like the Dogs in Space characters, I was a middle-class kid from the suburbs who was somewhat ‘slumming’ it – too old to live at home and too young to commit to anything that felt like a real job. And that’s what the film captures – the desire of youths to deconstruct themselves from mainstream society and rebuild themselves into something ‘real’, regardless of their background. Dogs in Spacemakes a point of reminding the audience that punk in Australia was a cultural movement embraced predominantly by the middle-class, but that didn’t make it any less charged or meaningful.
The film begins by defining how it situates itself within Australian culture. After brief 1957 archival footage of early Soviet space launches, which includes sending Laika the dog into orbit, Dogs in Space opens with a menacing shot of a beat-up car idling in the night. One of its very rough-looking occupants sticks his head out of the window and, in the most nasally Australian twang, snarls to an unseen passer-by, ‘Hey! Dog-face! Show us your snatch!’ The scene looks like it belongs to any number of Ozploitation films of the era, combining a Mad Max aesthetic with distinctly bogan pub rock culture. It’s a very specific image of Australian identity and one that is introduced at the start of Dogs in Space so it can be quickly shot down in flames. There are other faces to Australian culture and until then, and mostly since, those faces are not given much attention. These alternate faces are of course the punks of late 1970s Melbourne who are introduced in the film, camping outside a David Bowie concert. The car-load of obnoxious bogans screeches up to torment them, but are quickly dispensed with and sent on their way. This film is not for them, or those who identify with them. Instead it’s for a subculture that briefly thrived in inner-city student share houses and venues around Australia, whose legacy introduced and developed some of Australia’s most celebrated music.
The film’s title sequence then concludes with a slow approach shot of the film’s main setting: a run down house in Richmond filled with various occupants who are either living there legitimately, squatting, or simply hanging out. Over the top of the soundtrack different pieces of media float by: the opening titles of Countdown, a station identification for iconic Melbourne radio station Triple R and Molly Meldrum talking about the Bowie gig. The various characters who filter through the house are an assortment of musicians, political activists and folks just wanting to have a good time. They have sex, listen to music, take drugs and throw parties. One of them is even trying to study for his engineering exams.
The almost complete absence of a narrative allows the film to simply indulge in scene after scene of chaotic activity. Some characters we get to know, some are just fleeting fragments. Orchestrated long shots convey the energy and excitement of gigs and parties. Strands of music performances and conversations flow in and out of the film to make it a series of impressionist fragments that, once combined, make some sort of brilliant sense.
The soundtrack, produced by Ollie Olsen, is one of my favourite film soundtracks from Australia or anywhere else in the world for that matter. It includes songs by Iggy Pop, Gang of Four and Brian Eno plus an assortment of songs from Melbourne’s ‘little band scene’. Many of the songs are played in the film by the original performers, including Marie Hoy (who delivers one of the greatest covers of Rowland S. Howard’s* ‘Shivers’), Primitive Calculators and Thrush and the Cunts. Then there are the songs sung by Michael Hutchence, lead singer of pop group INXS and the film’s star. Hutchence’s character in the film is based on Sam Sejavka from The Ears, so appropriately Hutchence performs a couple of Ears covers, including the titular ‘Dogs In Space’. However, the stand-out for me is ‘Rooms For The Memory’ as it’s a brilliant fusion of post-punk and pop, linking the period the film is set in to the period the film was made in, and making it a catchy and eventually devastating song to finish the film with.
And what about Hutchence, in what would sadly be one of his few acting roles?* As the hedonistic, wild, self indulgent, magnetic and handsome Sam, he’s a bizarre Aussie Jim Morrison: reptilian, lecherous, pretentious and extraordinary. He is instantly recognisable as a creative genius who, through self-indulgence, is screwing up his life and the lives of those around him. You start off thinking Sam’s a bit of a prat and then get seduced by his carefree confidence and charismatic recklessness. This is all turned on its head in one of my favourite scenes when his mother shows up to do his laundry and bring him a hot dinner. Not only is his persona demythologised, but you also see the true extent of his selfishness and lazy sense of entitlement. And yet he is so confident, so carefree and so likeable, making him a wonderfully chaotic antihero to structure a chaotic anti-film around.
Then there is Saskia Post as Anna, Sam’s beautiful and tragic girlfriend who knows he is leeching off her, but can’t help being drawn back to him. Post provides the heart of the film, looking after the more vulnerable drifters who come through the house and being patient and tolerant of Sam, way beyond the call of duty. She radiates every time she is on screen with her combination of punk attitude and classical Hollywood beauty. The rest of the supporting cast are too extensive to mention and I latch onto somebody new on every viewing. However, I have a particular soft spot for Tim (Nique Needles) who looks so sad while pretending he was going to quit the band that have just kicked him out. I also love Chris Haywood’s cameo as the uncle with the chainsaw, and poor old Luchio (Tony Helou) who is trying to study for his exams amid the parties, band rehearsals, noisy sex and general mayhem – I once had a Luchio year.
Dogs in Space is one of the very few Australian films that reflects an Australian identity that I can relate to, even though it depicts a period and scene that I never knew. It’s affectionate and critical of Australia’s middle class punks; celebrating the scene while also providing a mournful coda for how it would all come to an end. Energetic, youthful, frequently hilarious and ultimately so sad, Dogs in Space is an Australian counter-culture classic to which I continually return, and introduce to new like-minded friends – who are inevitably annoyed that I haven’t shown it to them sooner.
*Note: The excellent documentary Autoluminescent: Rowland S. Howard, directed by Lynn-Maree Milburn and Richard Lowenstein, is releasing at selected Australian cinemas 27 October. Visit the film’s website and Facebook for more info.
Dogs in Space can be purchased on DVD online here.
Thomas Caldwell, 2011
About Thomas Caldwell: Thomas is a freelance writer, broadcaster and public speaker who specialises in film criticism and educational writing on film. He writes the popular film criticism blog Cinema Autopsy and reviews films for the Breakfasters on independent Melbourne radio station Triple R (3RRR 102.7FM). He is also the co-host of the Triple R film criticism podcast Plato’s Cave. Thomas is the author of the secondary school textbook Film Analysis Handbook and his film reviews, articles and interviews have appeared in The Age, The Big Issue, Overland, Senses of Cinema, Metro and Screen Education. In 2010 he won the Ivan Hutchinson Award for Writing on Australian Film in the 2010 Australian Film Critics Association (AFCA) Writing Awards.
Read Previous ‘Why I Adore’ Posts:
Paul Anthony Nelson (the ‘Why I Adore’ godfather and founder) introduces the concept, and rhapsodises about Mad Max. AFI Membership Administrator Lia McCrae-Moore revisits the lyrical beauty of One Night the Moon and Clem Bastow reminisces about a childhood spent watching the television show Round the Twist. Or you can read Anthony Morris flirting with disaster in his adoration of Romper Stomper, Annie Stevens going bridal with Muriel’s Wedding, or Popzilla bowing down before the altar of literary screen adaptations. Most recently, Lia McCrae-Moore showers affection on SBS’s high-octane police thriller, East West 101, Rochelle Simienowicz delves deeply into the ground-breaking television series, Love My Way, and Simon Elschlepp discovers a fondness for stylish and audacious futuristic noir, Dark City.
Contribute: We’re currently looking for more ’Why I Adore’ articles devoted to Australian film and television. Send a one paragraph summary to editor[at] afi.org.au and we’ll get back to you with more details.
Yep – ‘Tiss my fave film that changed my life, and was literally the soundtrack of my younger days – But I stopped reading the article, when it was stated that Dogs was Michael Hutchence’s only film role … what about when he played Shelly in Frankenstein Unbound ?? Adorable !!
Damn, you are absolutely right. Thanks for pointing that out. Sorry for the error and I stand very much corrected.*Text above has been amended.
Whatever happened to Richard Lowenstein. I expected him to grow in to a superstar of Oz cinema. Shame.
Richard Lowenstein continues to have a significant career – and is co-director of the excellent documentary Autoluminescent: Rowland S. Howard that releases shortly. He has directed lots of music videos, co-produced John Safran’s Music Jamboree as well as John Safran vs God for SBS Independent, and is a partner in the Melbourne-based production company, GHOST. He is also a partner in the feature film production company, Fandango Australia Pty Ltd along with Italian Producer – Domenico Procacci, Producer – Sue Murray, Lawyer – Bryce Menzies and Director – Rolf de Heer. (Thanks Wikipedia).
Where i can manage or to see this movie, whit subtitles in spanish?
The best place to ask would be to contact the distributor Ghost Films here http://www.ghostfilm.net/contact/
2011 and I might just be ready to watch Dogs in Space (and now Autoluminescent). Because I do want to see it. Back when Dogs in Space was released we were (not with cruel intentions) critical and questioning of why Michael Hutchence and outsider Saskia Post were chosen for the role. (all the guys fell for Saskia!) Michael was viewed as more of a ‘pop’ star, a bit too clean and good looking, not from the more thrashy underground post punk ‘scene’ of the movie. That’s where it lost it’s credibility for people I knew back then.
Silly, I know, they were actors of course.
Then, years later when I could afford a movie ticket, and after the death of friends and family in the ‘scene’, I still couldn’t watch because of too many painful memories after the death of friends and family from the ‘scene’. So… I’m nearly desensitised after sticking my toe in the water at the ‘I got drunk at the Crystal Ballroom’ facebook site.
Thanks for your comment and your memories. Hope you drop back to let us know what you think. I loved Autoluminescent, but it was a window on a scene I had no personal connection with, so a completely different persepective from yours.
Pingback: Why I Adore Dogs in Space « Cinema Autopsy
Pingback: Why I Adore: Big Brother Up Late | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore: Somersault | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore: Lantana | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore…The Horror of Picnic at Hanging Rock | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore… Nicole Kidman | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore… Bliss | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore… Neighbours | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore… Tony Martin | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore… Dad and Dave Come to Town | AFI blog
Pingback: Why I Adore… Heartbreak High | AFI blog